When Mark Zuckerberg announced Meta’s Superintelligence Labs (MSL) earlier this year, it was framed as a moonshot project meant to catapult the company to the forefront of the artificial intelligence race. The Facebook founder opened his checkbook wide, reportedly dangling offers in the hundreds of millions of dollars—sometimes even close to a billion, according to Futurism—to lure top AI minds from rivals like OpenAI, DeepMind, and Apple.
But just months after the big unveil, the lab is already facing turbulence. According to Wired, at least three researchers have quit, two of whom are returning to OpenAI after only brief stints at Meta.
The exits begin
Avi Verma and Ethan Knight, both previously associated with OpenAI, resigned from MSL and are now headed back to their former employer. Another high-profile exit is Rishabh Agarwal, an Indian researcher poached from Google DeepMind at a reported $1 million salary. Agarwal had joined Meta in April but announced on August 25 that this would be his last week at the lab.
In a post on X, he admitted the decision was difficult given the “talent and compute density” at MSL but added that he felt drawn to “a different kind of risk” after more than seven years at Google Brain, DeepMind, and Meta.
Notably, Agarwal quoted Zuckerberg himself in his farewell: “In a world that’s changing so fast, the biggest risk you can take is not taking any risk.” The remark has since been widely viewed as researchers turning Zuckerberg’s own mantra against him.
Why researchers are walking away
While neither Verma nor Knight commented on their departures, Wired notes that Meta’s AI operations have been plagued by reorganizations, shifting priorities, and reports of micromanagement at the very top. The company recently split its AI workforce into four groups, creating further uncertainty inside MSL.
Meanwhile, Agarwal’s exit highlights a tension many in the field acknowledge: the most talented researchers are not solely motivated by eye-popping salaries. DeepMind cofounder Demis Hassabis told Lex Fridman that true frontier scientists want to “help influence how AGI plays out and steward the technology safely into the world”—not simply chase paychecks.
This sentiment is echoed across the industry. Anthropic’s cofounder Benjamin Mann recently remarked, “My best case at Anthropic is we affect the future of humanity. My best case at Meta is we make money.”
OpenAI welcomes Meta defectors
Meta’s losses appear to be OpenAI’s gain. Alongside Verma and Knight, longtime Meta executive Chaya Nayak has also joined OpenAI, where she will work on special initiatives. Her exit after nearly a decade at Meta is seen as another blow to Zuckerberg’s plans.
The timing is notable. OpenAI, which had criticized Meta’s recruitment style as “distasteful,” now finds its bench strengthened by former Meta hires who chose mission alignment over compensation.
What the departures mean
Meta has invested heavily to close the gap with rivals in artificial general intelligence research, appointing former Scale AI chief Alexandr Wang and GitHub’s former CEO Nat Friedman to leadership positions. Yet the high-profile resignations suggest that a generous paycheck may not be enough to build and sustain a cohesive frontier AI team.
For Zuckerberg, the irony is sharp: after positioning himself as a visionary risk-taker, it is his recruits who are citing his own words as they walk out the door.
Whether Meta can stabilize its superintelligence project or continues to bleed talent will determine how it fares in the next phase of the AI race.
But just months after the big unveil, the lab is already facing turbulence. According to Wired, at least three researchers have quit, two of whom are returning to OpenAI after only brief stints at Meta.
The exits begin
Avi Verma and Ethan Knight, both previously associated with OpenAI, resigned from MSL and are now headed back to their former employer. Another high-profile exit is Rishabh Agarwal, an Indian researcher poached from Google DeepMind at a reported $1 million salary. Agarwal had joined Meta in April but announced on August 25 that this would be his last week at the lab.
In a post on X, he admitted the decision was difficult given the “talent and compute density” at MSL but added that he felt drawn to “a different kind of risk” after more than seven years at Google Brain, DeepMind, and Meta.
Notably, Agarwal quoted Zuckerberg himself in his farewell: “In a world that’s changing so fast, the biggest risk you can take is not taking any risk.” The remark has since been widely viewed as researchers turning Zuckerberg’s own mantra against him.
This is my last week at @AIatMeta. It was a tough decision not to continue with the new Superintelligence TBD lab, especially given the talent and compute density. But after 7.5 years across Google Brain, DeepMind, and Meta, I felt the pull to take on a different kind of risk.…
— Rishabh Agarwal (@agarwl_) August 25, 2025
Why researchers are walking away
While neither Verma nor Knight commented on their departures, Wired notes that Meta’s AI operations have been plagued by reorganizations, shifting priorities, and reports of micromanagement at the very top. The company recently split its AI workforce into four groups, creating further uncertainty inside MSL.
Meanwhile, Agarwal’s exit highlights a tension many in the field acknowledge: the most talented researchers are not solely motivated by eye-popping salaries. DeepMind cofounder Demis Hassabis told Lex Fridman that true frontier scientists want to “help influence how AGI plays out and steward the technology safely into the world”—not simply chase paychecks.
This sentiment is echoed across the industry. Anthropic’s cofounder Benjamin Mann recently remarked, “My best case at Anthropic is we affect the future of humanity. My best case at Meta is we make money.”
OpenAI welcomes Meta defectors
Meta’s losses appear to be OpenAI’s gain. Alongside Verma and Knight, longtime Meta executive Chaya Nayak has also joined OpenAI, where she will work on special initiatives. Her exit after nearly a decade at Meta is seen as another blow to Zuckerberg’s plans.
The timing is notable. OpenAI, which had criticized Meta’s recruitment style as “distasteful,” now finds its bench strengthened by former Meta hires who chose mission alignment over compensation.
What the departures mean
Meta has invested heavily to close the gap with rivals in artificial general intelligence research, appointing former Scale AI chief Alexandr Wang and GitHub’s former CEO Nat Friedman to leadership positions. Yet the high-profile resignations suggest that a generous paycheck may not be enough to build and sustain a cohesive frontier AI team.
For Zuckerberg, the irony is sharp: after positioning himself as a visionary risk-taker, it is his recruits who are citing his own words as they walk out the door.
Whether Meta can stabilize its superintelligence project or continues to bleed talent will determine how it fares in the next phase of the AI race.
You may also like
Not just Venice is sinking! Here's the list of world's most famous cities at risk of going underwater by 2100
Robin Westman: MAGA Is blaming Ilhan Omar for the Minneapolis shooting; and weaponizing the trans-identity
Telangana CM extends support to Prime Volleyball League as Hyderabad gears up to host Season 4
India appoints Dinesh Patnaik as next High Commissioner to Canada
British cycling champ Chris Froome airlifted to hospital after serious crash
